One of the Team: Lukas Kwasniok’s Jersey Choice as a Leadership Signal.

Roger Hampel

From the opening rounds of the Bundesliga season, Lukas Kwasniok has drawn attention not for tactics or substitutions, but for what he wore on the sideline. The new head coach of 1. FC Köln chose to appear in the club’s official jersey, rather than the standard suit or branded training gear.

Regulatory Context

Under DFL (German Football League) regulations, coaches and staff may wear official jerseys as long as the shirt differs in colour from the one worn by players on the pitch.

Kwasniok has applied this rule consistently:

• Home jersey for away matches

• Away or third jersey for home matches

  
  

As he explained:“The decision was clear for me: if I’m allowed to do it, I will. Because I want to commit to this club, and I do, and I also wear this jersey with pride.”

Sports Management Context

Traditionally, coaches use attire to signal authority. Suits emphasise professionalism, tracksuits underline readiness for training ground detail. In both cases, the coach remains visually separate from the team.

By adopting the jersey, Kwasniok reduces that separation. He presents himself as part of the same collective identity. This aligns with Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979), which shows that leaders seen as “one of us” strengthen cohesion and loyalty within a group.

Other sports provide parallels. In baseball, managers have always worn the same uniforms as players, reinforcing the message of unity and shared responsibility.

Perceptions

The move has been widely noted in German and international media. BBC Sport, 90min and Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger all highlighted the unusual image of a Bundesliga coach in a player’s kit.

Reactions from supporters were largely positive. Many saw it as authentic and passionate, a sign of commitment to the club. Some critics questioned whether a coach should blend visually with players, but overall the gesture has been interpreted as a clear statement of identity.

Leadership Framing

Coaches often define their public persona.

• José Mourinho styled himself as the Special One.

• Jürgen Klopp embraced the Normal One.

Kwasniok positions himself differently: “I’m one of you.”

This narrative supports solidarity with both players and fans, strengthening his leadership brand in a competitive Bundesliga environment.

Business Significance

For football organisations, such symbolic choices carry measurable value.

• Leadership Branding: A coach’s image influences the perception of the club among fans, media, and sponsors.

• Authenticity: Audiences reward visible, straightforward expressions of commitment.

• Sponsorship Value: Wearing the official shirt ensures continuous exposure of kit sponsors across broadcast coverage.

• Media Impact: The unusual visual has generated international attention, creating additional earned reach without marketing spend.

  
  

Conclusion

Kwasniok’s decision to coach in a jersey demonstrates how small details can shape wider perceptions of leadership and identity. In football’s commercial and cultural landscape, authenticity and symbolism matter.

By choosing the same colours worn by his players, he delivers a simple message with strategic effect:“I’m one of you.”